Changing Hearts & Minds in Greenbrier County WV
Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett says she doesn’t consider the Roe v. Wade decision that allowed abortion on demand a “super-precedent” that can’t be overturned. Judge Barrett said Roe is not in same category as the Supreme Court’s 1954 Brown v. Board of Education ruling, which declared segregated public schools unconstitutional because there is still a massive debate about
Democrat senators backed by the pro-abortion movement blasted U.S. Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett as a threat to Roe v. Wade on Monday during her Senate confirmation hearing. Planned Parenthood favorites Sens. Kamala Harris, of California, and Cory Booker, of New Jersey, especially tried to drum up fear by claiming women’s rights are at stake. And by women’s rights, they mean
Judge Amy Coney Barrett delivered her opening remarks to the Senate Judiciary Committee this morning and she made two major points. First, she talked about the proper role of the courts, saying they are not supposed to make law and legislate from the bench. She also refused to back down to attacks from Senate Democrats on her faith, saying she
West Virginians For Life introduced and backed this legislation. We’re thrilled it’s now law, and that WV is yet again making nationwide news with pro-life leadership. Join us: wvforlife.org/membership — Better yet, step up to Rose Society Membership while you’re there! — Already a member? Give here: wvforlife.org/donate Note: It’s newsworthy that our WV legislators succeeded in bipartisan passage of
The Christian Post’s national headline reads: “W.Va. governor signs law requiring doctors to help babies born alive after abortion.” It’s newsworthy that our WV legislators succeeded in bipartisan passage of the very thing federal lawmakers can’t even bring to the floor: actionable protection for babies who survive abortionists’ best efforts to kill them. The Mountain State’s leadership continues to be
Judge: “There is nothing in the record which would lead this court to believe that the mother is unwilling to provide the appropriate care for the child.” A Minnesota mom whose 10-month-old son was taken from her by child protective services because she didn’t stick around the hospital for a second opinion on his cough finally regained custody—four months and six court
The U.S. Supreme Court announced Friday it will take up the case of Louisiana’s admitting privileges law, which could have the potential of upending the high court’s most recent pro-abortion precedent. The court announced Friday it has decided to review June Medical Services LLC v. Gee, NPR reports. The case concerns Louisiana’s Act 620, which requires abortion centers to make arrangements for admitting women
A petition to end Roe v. Wade was delivered to the Supreme Court yesterday with a quarter of a million signatures. “We urgently plead with… the United States Supreme Court to do the right thing as you did in one of your greatest cases, Brown v. Board of Education, which overturned a 58-year-old precedent of the United States.” Click here
CBS News had the following to say about their interview with Karen Cross, who articulated well some key facts about abortion, the US Constitution, and the warped view of the 1973 SCOTUS that invented “out of whole cloth” a so-called “constitutional right” to abortion for any reason, at any time up until birth: “Anti-abortion advocate on plan to challenge Roe
The preliminary hearings for pro-life heroes David Daleiden and Sandra Merritt concluded this week Wednesday in San Francisco. The pair are hopeful that sworn testimony over the past weeks demonstrates that those who trafficked aborted-baby body parts are guilty of crimes, not the whistleblowers who exposed it. Judge Christopher Hite’s ruling on whether the case will proceed to trial is
